

One of my favorite works in the exhibition was Fazal Sheikh's "Afghan Images", a series of black and white photographs depicting hands holding small photos of loved ones who were killed or disappeared, mostly during the Soviet-Afghanistan War. Accompanied by wall texts with the back stories, these images provide a glimpse into the complicated, complex and painful recent history of Afghanistan, especially in light of the simplistic and rather reactionary film "Wilson's War", which just hit the theaters.
I always love to see a film by Harun Farocki being included in an exhibition, even though I am not quite sure why one encounters his work lately more in visual art institutions and biennials rather than movie theaters and film festivals. "Videograms of a Revolution" is a fine piece of work about the end of Ceauşescu rule in Romania, but definitely not my favorite film by this underappreciated German filmmaker. Anri Sala's "Intervista" on the other hand, seems more successful in investigating the fault lines of recent Eastern European history. Sala found an old 16mm reel depicting his mother with then-Albanian-communist-leader Enver Hoxa. Anri Sala had little information about this event and the film's audio track was lost. So, Sala set out to document his investigation about the content and context of this film reel.
Other works in the show included a poignant series of staged photographs by Zoe Leonard, called "The Fae Richards Photo Archive", found images arranged by Tacita Dean ("Floh"), and Sherri Levine's notorious "After Walker Evans" photographs. All these works challenge authenticity and authorship, and question the meaning of images and their archives as valid historical inscriptions. And then there were the usual suspects. I am actually getting tired of encountering Struffskys in ever new contexts of various group exhibitions. But yes, "Archive Fever" also includes Thomas Ruff and two of his "Machines" photographs. I wonder why Enwezor didn't opt for the Bechers instead. I mean one won't find a more rigorous archive than their building typologies.
But the one thing I really would love to know from the curator is: What was the huge stack of white letter-size paper for? It was placed at the entry of the exhibition with a sign encouraging visitors "Take One". A blank sheet of paper? For notes? My personal archive? I just couldn't decipher the purpose. Perhaps I need to read some more Derrida. In any case, I would definitely recommend this exhibition to anyone academically minded and/or interested in the subject of the archive and documentary.
